How Do Residents of Hawaii Get Their Drinking Water?

When I first moved to Hawaii as a new hydrologist for the U.S. Geological Survey, one of my first questions was:  “Here on a volcanic island surrounded by sea water with no surface reservoirs for storage, where do the islanders get their fresh drinking water?”  Because the  material making up the islands is very permeable, everything below sea level must be already saturated with sea water.

The geology reports all showed that over 90% of Hawaii’s water supply is from groundwater but its origin still puzzled me.  Then I was informed about the density differences between the abundant rainwater and native intruded sea water below the islands.  Infiltrated rainwater has a total mineral content of about 50-100 ppm (parts per million) or mg/L (milligrams per  Liter) and the sea water up to sea level beneath the islands has a total dissolves solids concentration of over 35,000 ppm or mg/L.  This significant difference in mineral content also results in a very significant difference in density of the fresh rainwater and basal groundwater which is essentially sea water below the islands.  This condition called the Ghyben Herzberg principal  is the reason why the fresh water actually floats on the salt water.  Additionally, the weight of the freshwater bubble on top of the sea water  depressed the interface at a ratio of 40:1.  Meaning that for each one foot of freshwater measured above sea level, there are 40 feet of freshwater depressing the sometimes interface between the fresh water above and the sea water below.

In some areas of the islands there are vertical dikes of almost impermeable rocks that have intruded into the permeable volcanic rock. These vertical dikes have created protected cells for the fresh rainwater to be stored within the ground well above the salt water level. The erosion of the rock making up the exposed volcano  above the sea level has resulted in a layer of caprock deposits along the shore line. The very low permeability of this caprock actually restricts the flow of freshwater outward to the ocean.

Honolulu Board of Water Supply  cross section of Hawaiian island showing fresh groundwater

Honolulu Board of Water Supply cross section of Hawaiian island showing fresh groundwater

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Advertisements

September 10, 2013 is National Protect Your Groundwater Day

The goal of this day sponsored by the National Groundwater Association (NGWA)  plus many federal, state and local water agencies is to bring awareness to the importance of protecting our groundwater resources.  The national site where you can view suggestions that we each can practice to protect these resources is at:

http://www.ngwa.org/Events-Education/groundwater-day/Pages/default.aspx

As  many street drains are now labeled “No dumping–drains to the ocean”, anything that is dumped on the ground surface can percolate downward to the groundwater supply.  In many areas of the country the soil layer is directly in contact with the surface of the water table below.  So, hazardous chemicals, toxic wastes and even excessive fertilizers can rapidly reach the potable groundwater supply beneath the land surface.  Because groundwater moves so slow it can take much longer to clean up what is accidentally dumped into the groundwater supply than to clean up surface supplies.

So Whose Nitrate is it Anyway—Is It From Pigs or People?

When I was working in Indiana a local controversy arose regarding the source of high nitrate concentrations that was infiltrating from groundwater into a small tributary and then into a large surface stream.   It is known that most elevated nitrate concentrations come from fertilizers or animal and human wastes. Because there was a large swine farm near that location almost everyone believed the nitrate had to come from their operations.  However this feed lot was fairly well-designed and the pig wastes were captured and removed so efficiently that the pig farm owner believed it couldn’t be from his operation.   Also in that same reach of the tributary were numerous homes along the stream area that were on older septic tanks.   So, when they presented this dilemma to me, I suggested to the swine operations that the high nitrate water be analyzed also for caffeine, which had been recently developed as a fairly simple analysis.   We moved from the area before I heard any more about this problem.  However, from second hand reports I learned that they discovered the high nitrate plume also contained significant caffeine.   Since pigs don’t drink much coffee and humans drink lots, the source of the high nitrate was determined to be from the septic tanks.

Using Trees to Determine How Fast Contaminated Groundwater is Moving

In the early 1990’s some hydrogeologists needed to know how fast a plume of contaminated groundwater was moving toward Chesapeake Bay.   A large area of land near the Bay had been a dumpsite for unexploded munitions from World War II following the war.   Apparently these munitions had been buried and forgotten until some rusted through from infiltrating rainfall and exploded, bringing attention to their existence.  Fear that the toxic chemicals in the burial site would reach the Chesapeake Bay caused the site owners to investigate.   However, because they were aware that drilling sampling wells might cause additional explosions, they had to find another way to determine if the plume was really moving toward the Bay and how fast.  The project chief noticed that there was a line of mature trees between the dump site and Chesapeake Bay.   Knowing that the plume contained very high concentrations of iron, he took cores from the trees and by analyzing the specific rings representing specific years, was able to determine that the source of water for one tree had a significant rise in iron concentration in 1960.   He took additional samples from another tree about 500 feet closer to the Bay from the first tree.   This tree had a peaked concentration of high iron in about 1965.   The findings indicated that the plume was moving at a rate of about 100 feet per year (500 feet/ 5 years).  

Several studies using this tree ring dating method have been conducted in recent years with similar success and many companies are now conducting analyses of tree rings to determine the extent plumes of specific toxic organic chemicals.   See publication: “Phytoforensics, Dendrochemistry and Phytoscreening: New Green Tools for Delineating Contaminants from Past and Present” in Environmental Science and Technology dated June 14, 2011 pp. 6218-6226.  Also check web site: http://pubs.water.usgs.gov/sir2008-5088, which contains a user guide for this technology.